The Role of Justice in Society Essay -- Just Justice Fair Philosophy E

The Role of Justice in Society through and through the egalitarian reasoning of John Rawls and the act-utilitarianist perspective of J.J.C. Smart, I will probe the concept of arbiter. In accordance with Rawls, I intend to argue that whatsoever changes in society that will increase the burden carried by the poorest 5% are unjust, even if these changes increase the average level of happiness for the separate 95%. With regard to ethics, justice is defined as fairness, where altogether situations should be treated alike. For one to exhibit justice, one must portray the character of being fair and reasonable in all situations. While egalitarians judge justice based on equality, utilitarians are only interested in justice as a means to an end. Smart advocates the principle of utility, which defines the morally action as whatever produces the greatest net happiness for everyone touch by that act. To identify an act as just, Rawls employs the theory of justice as fairness. This theo ry stresses the principle of equal rights, and that an act is just if equality is accomplished by everyone affected by the act.Before delving into John Rawls views on a just society it is essential to understand his perception of the theatrical role of justice in society, as described in his book A hypothesis of Justice. Justice in society enforces individuals rights and to deny that the loss of granting immunity for some is made right by a greater substantially shared by others. When the notion of justice becomes shared by all citizens, and equality is achieved, civility between members of society will restrict the use of goods and services of some individuals as means to personal ends. Overall, Rawls argues that the most distinctive role of justice in society is to equally distribute rights and duties to individuals. The underlying egalitarian viewpoint is that individuals do not possess any characteristics that would justify inequalities in the distribution of companionabl e benefits and burdens. The principles of justice, as depicted in Rawls book, are chosen by individuals an initial position of equality. These principles can be applied to ferment structural issues in society such as the distribution of social and economic advantages, the distribution of basic rights and duties to citizens. Rawls argues that in order for the principles of justice to register an ideal society, where equality between citizens is realized, several hypothetical ... ... interest bandage in pursuit of maximizing happiness. Overall I agree with the principles fix up forth by John Rawls in his book A opening of Justice, because it protects against discrimination of the lowest 5 of the population whose voice is usually damaged and overlooked in society. Works CitedBayles, Michael, ed. Contemporary Utilitarianism. Garden City Anchor, 1968Hoffman, Michael W, Robert E. Fredrick, and look into S. Schwartz. Business Ethics Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. 4th Ca nadian ed. saucy York McGraw-Hill, 2001Lamont, Julian. Distributive Justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 Edition). Main. Edward N. Zalta. 13 promenade 2004. . Nussbaum, Martha. The Enduring signification of John Rawls. Evatt Foundation. 13 March 2004. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Canadian Ed. Cambridge The Belknap Press, 1971Scott, Alex. John Rawls A Theory of Justice. 14 March 2003. Smart, and Bernard Williams. Utilitarianism For and Against. Trowbridge Redwood Burn, 1973Utilitarianism Resources. BLTC Research. 15 March 2004. Williams, Jon. An Examination of John Rawlss Critique of Utilitarianism. 13 March 2004