Omnivores Delimma Essay

In America, we do non decide what is healthy and what is not by the authenticity of born(p) nutrition, but rather nutrition positions. If we ar in a store and see a label that says but 100 gram calories we argon drawn to that item instead of an item label radical or all-natural. This is because as a society, we be always on a fad diet and believe that health has to do with calorie counting and sugar intake as opposed to the actual out coif signal of the treasurement itself. In Michael Pollans give The Omnivores Dilemma, argues that this is not the case. Pollan goes into an in-depth investigating to show that the original feed grasp is the healthiest and some realistic of the threesome principal nutrient custody that sustain us today the industrial, the total, and the hunter-gatherer (7),He describes the omnivores dilemma as the constant problem that citizenry with vast steps of pabulum must face everyday. The question Pollan continuously raises is the repo rt that because we pee the big businessman to w be almost everything, we struggle with universe sufficient to decide what the best choice is. Therefore we must always ask ourselves the question what should we eat? Throughout his extraordinary exploratory scratch line overtake research, Pollan shows that we would be healthy and happier if we truly knew where our food was coming from and how it was produced. Pollan promotes a food chain where the food can be directly traced back to its origins, as opposed to change food. Therefore, it can be conceived that the best way to achieve this supposition is to view the organic food chain.The organic food chain is best for expressing Pollans judgment that if we know where our food originates, we will be find great satisfaction in our meals. The organic food chain is one that provides the most natural benefits to humans. A prime example of this can be seen on sponsor- coldms because expose is the foundation of the intricate foo d chain (126). Pollan points out that grass is typically overlooked as a material of consumption, however grass is one of the solid beginnings of the big organic food chain.There atomic number 18 two main human-grass phases. The first is interruptd by animate beings because they argon able to digest the grass and therefore produce snapper for us to eat. In this process humans deliberately promoted the welfare of thegrasses in order to make and fatten the animals they dep shuttinged on. The second phase of the human-grass notificationship, is known as the purpose of agriculture (129). In this phase grass progressed to produce dense seeds that could nourish humans directly(129). Through this progression, this specific grass eliminated the necessity for animals to mediate the relationship between grass and people. This simple process is beyond organic and without the use of any kind of machinery. Therefore, allowing us to see where our food originated, which goes hand in hand w ith Pollans theory that if we see where our food comes from we are healthier and happier because we know precisely what we are putting into our bodies.When it comes to big organic food, Pollan starts his investigation at Whole Foods. It is here that he brings up the idea that we like organic food because we believe that it is wholesome. Big organic food is food that is truly all natural and beyond organic, with no machinery or paranormal influences. The success of organic markets play into Pollans idea that we enjoy food more when we know where it comes from. The organic food chain is the most realistic option out of the three proposed food chains ( change, organic, and hunter-gatherers) that best promotes Pollens philosophy of the human relation to nature.industrialized food chains are the furthest food chains from the lifestyle Pollan is move to encourage. Both the conventional industrialized food supply and the industrial organic supply imply through and through labeling and a dvertising that their products are natural, when in fact that is not the case. When the word organic is labeled on anything we assume that it is all-natural which fulfils our deepest, oldest longings for a connection to the earth (137). We as a society tend to alone believe and assume the clever marketing organic companies use, however this is an im sinless tense renewal for direct observation of how food is produced (137).When Pollan investigated the industrialized food chain, he learned that corn is found in everything from food to batteries essentially everything we eat is from a form of corn. Corn is a cheap crop, cheaper than grass, therefore perfect for an industrial production process. Because corn is so cheap thereis perpetually an excess amount that necessarily to be disposed of, because of this problem extra amounts of corn are used to feed appals. The problem with is that a cow is by nature not a corn eater (64) this is the first sign that this process is unnatura l. Due to the unnatural meals the cows are squeeze to consume, there are many problems that come in return.One major problem is bloating due to the cows diet that contains too untold starch and too little roughage (77), this small dietary substitute can often times lead to the animals suffocation. However, if the cow does not snuff it from their unsuitable diet, they still must be injected with antibiotics to ensure their health. This also fails to cleave to the idea of healthy food, additionally, the animals drugs are plainly being used to treat sick animals, yet the animals probably wouldnt be sick if not for the diet of the grain we feed them (79).Once the animal is killed for the industrialized food supply, what doesnt pass through the gut of a food animal to become meat will pass through one of Americas twenty-five wet-mills (86). These wet-mills are what makes processed food that are used for supplements, especially by big name brands such(prenominal) as McDonalds.This fo od chain by far is the most unnatural of them all. However, it is we, the modern Americans, which keep this food chain successful. We are a perfect example for the phrase ignorance is bliss. We do not think that we are drinking corn when we have a soda, and we automatically assume the meat in our fast-food burgers is natural, healthy meat, when this could not be further from the truth. Pollan goes as far as to call this food schematic (119), he states that once we are finished with our industrialized meal we are not satisfied, but simply, regrettably, all-inclusive (119). By leaving us unsatisfied, the industrialized food supply supports Pollans beliefs that knowing where our food comes from satisfies us and makes us happier eaters.In addition to the industrialized food chain, Pollan also finds wrong doings in the industrial organic food supply. The term organic is meant to refer to food that is made from nature, not machinery. The industrial organic process supply utilizes machine ry, though in an environmentally sound way,to produce their food. In an industrial organic process, a machine is used to transform inputs of seed and fossil energy into outputs of carbohydrate and protein(130). Industrial extreme is a paradox, because the word organic is meant to refer to food that is alone natural with no intercourse with machines, however in the Industrial Organic process, machines are employed. This process is still a process of manufacturing, and does not have the correct use of Pollans idea of humans relation to nature because they take us farther from natural food, and the knowledge of where our food comes from.In The Omnivores Dilemma I found Pollans idea of how to engage with the natural world compelling, however I also it unrealistic. though I do believe that it would be in all move of the environment (including humans) best interest to establish a completely natural food chain, I also think that in this day and age, that would be impossible. Our modern day society is not necessarily focused on what is the best thing for us, but what is easiest. Even though processed foods from McDonlands are unnatural and bad for our bodies, the food has a decent taste, is affordable, and is fast. some(prenominal) modern Americans are not thinking slightly the future or where their food originated from because they have so many different things on their mind, and if they are knowledgeable about where their food came from, many of them simply do not care. As long as it is filling and tasty, it gets the demarcation done.In the last page of the introduction to this book Pollan says many people today seem perfectly content eating at the end of an industrial food chain, without a thought in the world this book is probably not for them(11). This sentence further proves my idea that people just now do not care enough to change their way of living. Pollan is exactly right when he says this book is not for them because a decent amount of people do not want to know where their food comes, they do not want to spoil their appetite, and there lies the problem. In modern America, citizens are perfectly content with how things are now, and they have no reason to put in extra effort, time, and money, to fix something that they do not believe needs fixing.